Efficient Gain and Loss Amortization and Optimal Funding in Pension Plans
نویسندگان
چکیده
The authors consider efficient methods of amortizing actuarial gains and losses in defined-benefit pension plans. In the context of a simple model where asset gains and losses emerge as a consequence of random (independent and identically distributed) rates of investment return, it has been shown that direct amortization of such gains and losses leads to more variable funding levels and contribution rates, compared with an indirect and proportional form of amortization that “spreads” the gains and losses. Stochastic simulations are performed and they indicate that spreading remains more efficient than amortization with simple AR(1) and MA(1) rates of return. Similar results are obtained when a more comprehensive actuarial stochastic investment model (which includes economic wage inflation) is simulated. Proportional spreading is rationalized as the contribution control that optimizes mean square deviations in the contributions and fund levels when the funding process is Markovian and the fund is invested in two assets (a random risky and a risk-free asset). Efficient spreading and amortization periods are suggested for the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada.
منابع مشابه
Should Public Retirement Plans be Fully Funded ?
Most state and local retirement plans strive for full funding, at least by actuarial standards. Funding measured at market values fluctuates and often falls short. A common argument for full funding is that pensions are a form of deferred compensation that does not justify a debt. The paper examines public finance, political economy, and financial market issues that bear on optimal funding, bro...
متن کاملAcademic Repository ) Intergenerational risk sharing within funded pension schemes
We study risk sharing between generations for a variety of realistic collective funded pension schemes, where pension benefits and contributions may depend on the funding ratio and the asset returns. The collective pension schemes organizing intergenerational risk sharing are optimized with respect to the generosity of pension benefits, the asset allocation and the risk allocation rules. We per...
متن کاملShould Corporate Pension Funds Invest in Risky Assets?
Whether defined-benefit corporate pension plans should invest in risky assets has always been subject to debate, and the risky pension asset allocation frequently causes concerns. In this study, we model corporate pension decisions in a setting where a firm balances its risk management concern with employees’ preference for systematic risk exposure. For a reasonable set of parameter values, the...
متن کاملPension Risk Management with Funding and Buyout Options
There has been a surge of interest in recent years from defined benefit pension plan sponsors in de-risking their plans with strategies such as “longevity hedges” and “pension buyouts” (Lin et al., 2015). While buyouts are attractive in terms of value creation, they are capital intensive and expensive, particularly for firms with underfunded plans. The existing literature mainly focuses on the ...
متن کاملU.S. Public Pension Funding and State Growth Effects
Does U.S. state pension funding affect real GDP growth rates? Do states that witness higher GDP growth also have better funded pensions? Can one expect less GDP growth when state pensions are poorly funded? My study took the funding ratio of state pension plans, the asset-to-liability ratio, and compared it with real state GDP levels. The methods I used consisted of time series panel data regre...
متن کامل